KOffice vs. OpenOffice
Art Alexion
art.alexion at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 11:35:17 UTC 2008
Interesting last paragraph. (Sorry, the iTouch mail.app doesn't allow
selecting of quoted text for trimming)
I use KDE/kontact for everything personal and prefer it, but gnome and
evolution integrate much better on my work machine.
It does seem to be a matter of philosophy.
--
Art Alexion
Sent unsigned from an iPod. That's the reason for the top posting as
well.
On Sep 28, 2008, at 11:35 PM, Paul Lemmons <paul at lemmons.name> wrote:
> Willy K. Hamra wrote:
>> I've read in Kubuntu's website about the new koffice beta released.
>> Ever
>> since i started using linux, i've been using openoffice, and i think
>> it's a very nice suite, definitely better than Microsoft Office. but
>> what about this koffice? i've never seen it or tried it yet. anything
>> special about it? any more functionality? i guess it would behave
>> better
>> in KDE since it's designed using qt (if i'm not mistaken), so it
>> would
>> look and behave better than gtk apps, but anything fancy about it?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>>
> KOffice is nice and simple. It does 90% of what you want in an
> office suite, if you are a heavy office suite user. If you are a
> lite user or are just working with personal documents that
> percentage approaches 100% pretty quickly.
>
> I think that the biggest difference between the two products is the
> philosophy driving both products. OOo's goal is to compete directly
> with the MS Suite. They read and write the MS formats transparently.
> Their programs compete on the feature level as well. It is their
> goal to be useful in a business or corporate environment where MS
> has a dominate footprint.
>
> Koffice take a different track. They ask the question, what makes
> sense in a wordprocessor/spreadsheet/etc. Then they focus their
> efforts there. They do not necessarily see that compatibility with
> the MS Suite as a high priority. They want to make a good standalone
> product first.
>
> This is a two edged sword, though. By focusing on the application
> they have created a fairly usable, simple suite that meets almost
> 100% of the needs of the average home user. They do this with a
> small footprint and be quite nimble about it. The downside is that
> it is not usable in a corporate environment. While it is pretty good
> and reading Word documents, it is not perfect. The last time I tried
> it it could not write Word documents at all. If you want to used
> alternatives to MS in a large business it must be able to play 100%
> with the MS Suite.
>
> You may hear a little frustration here. I really like KDE. I really
> WANT to use the PIM and Office suites. I can't. While I respect
> their focus I believe that they have neglected the corporate user.
> Until their suite integrates well with the the corporate world, it
> will stay a tool for the hobbyist and home user. It is really too
> bad. It could be so much more.
> --
> kubuntu-users mailing list
> kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-users
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list