KDE File Chooser in GTK apps on Kubuntu
Art Alexion
art.alexion at gmail.com
Tue Oct 21 18:41:02 UTC 2008
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 2:09:12 pm Derek Broughton wrote:
> Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > But don't even ask the Amarok
> > developers to port it to GTK, that's a no go and makes simply no
> > sense. IMHO: why port something beautiful to something ugly?
>
> Absolutely, but if you're used to ugly, you'd probably hate having a single
> beautiful application on your desktop, making everything else look bad :-)
>
> Cinderella's stepsisters didn't like her showing them up, either.
I have a couple of gnome computers and occasionally monitor the Ubuntu and
other Gnome lists. I can assure, they dislike KDE as much as KDE aficionados
dislike Gnome. It isn't that they haven't seen KDE, they really like Gnome
better.
I prefer KDE myself, but some things, like evolution/exchange just work better
than any KDE alternative. Frankly, looks can be pleasant, but works well is
much more important to me. I prefer konqueror because it *works* better than
nautilus. I prefer amarok because it *works* better than banshee. But I
prefer the ugly easyTAG because it *works* better than kid3.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081021/d005618c/attachment.sig>
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list