Beta 8.10 released

[Steve Lamb]

p.daniels wrote:
> That's not true. Every point you've forwarded in this discussion has
> been addressed by someone (I just went through the archive, so yeah, I'm
> sure). If you can find a counter-example please quote it.

    The fact that moving forward in spite of public outcry, now twice, even
though the alternative is still viable in spite of what the developers might
thing?  The fact that Ubuntu, and its subprojects, are not supposed to be
forcing people who want "just works" to "just test it" or "just shut-up"?
Neither of those has been addressed.