Kde3.5 / Kde4.x OR Kde3.5 / Nde1.x

[Myriam Schweingruber]

Hi Martin,

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 18:16, Martin Laberge <mlsoft at videotron.ca> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2008 05:42:15 Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> 2008/11/13 Martin Laberge <mlsoft at videotron.ca>:
>> > For 10 years, (from 1998 to 2008) I had a total Qt solution
>> > for accounting/inventory for a big distribution company.
>> > (the soft standed right, thru the cycle of Qt versions, without
>> > almost any change in the code)
>> >
>> >
>> > This passed from Qt1 to Qt2 to Qt3, without a itch. (maybe some little)
>> >
>> > Now, Qt4/Kde4. My solution is Borked. Just to start all over again.

Not necessarily, why not stick with Ot3? It's not going to disappear
in a night. I know big banks still using old mainframes for
compatibility reasons and maintain old IBM assembler code for the same
reason. As these are not distributed things, where is the problem?

But then, Qt4.0 came out like 3 years ago, so it's not that new. And
it's such a good API, there will most likely never be a Qt5 if I
understood the Trolltech devs right (hum, Nokia devs now actually).

Did you try the conversion scripts Qt3to4? They come with the new API
and you really don't have to rewrite ALL your code. Most of it can be
ported automatically with these scripts. So take a deep breath and go
on :)

Greets

Myriam

-- 
Protect your freedom, join the Fellowship of FSFE!
http://www.fsfe.org
Please don't send me proprietary file formats,
use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)