Why do people dislike Dolphin?
Art Alexion
art.alexion at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 20:54:21 UTC 2008
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 3:34:29 pm Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I think that it was a good decision:
> 1) Web devs don't get confused with yet another browser
Reality check: Too few people use Konqueror as a web browser for most web
developers to care. This thread is evidence that Konqueror isn't even used
by a significant number of KDE users as a web browser, let alone the public
as a whole. In reality, my bank cares as much about Konqueror users as it
does about Lynx or Links users.
> 2) Simple end users get a simple file manager
> 3) Advanced users can use Konqueror like we always have.
But isn't that "simple file manager" the kio_slave that provides the
simplistic future functionality for Konqueror-as-file-manager? How does
running dolphin through Konqueror, make it less simplistic and more powerful?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081105/d7ffd5c7/attachment.sig>
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list