Common storage for adept_manager

John Pierce john.j35 at
Thu Jun 19 15:56:08 UTC 2008

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Antonio PĂ©rez <aplistas at> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Derek Broughton <news at> wrote:
>> I use apt-move, as I've been mentioning in a current thread on ubuntu-users.
>> There are many similar applications.  However, a quick glance at apt-cacher
>> looks like a slightly better alternative.  I access my apt-move repository
>> through Apache, whereas apt-cacher runs its own server - that's no big deal
>> if you're already running Apache, but a clear win for apt-cacher otherwise.
>> My secondary machines all have to point to Ubuntu in case the package they
>> need isn't on my mirror, whereas apt-cacher simply fetches anything it
>> doesn't already have.
> Yes, I think it's the best option.
> Apt-cacher is easy to configure (very, very easy), and you must only
> change apt sources from http://* to http://yourlocalserver
> on every local machines.
Looking at apt-cacher, thanks for all of your input.

Registered Linux User 263680, get counted at

More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list