Common storage for adept_manager

[Antonio Pérez]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca> wrote:

> I use apt-move, as I've been mentioning in a current thread on ubuntu-users.
> There are many similar applications.  However, a quick glance at apt-cacher
> looks like a slightly better alternative.  I access my apt-move repository
> through Apache, whereas apt-cacher runs its own server - that's no big deal
> if you're already running Apache, but a clear win for apt-cacher otherwise.
> My secondary machines all have to point to Ubuntu in case the package they
> need isn't on my mirror, whereas apt-cacher simply fetches anything it
> doesn't already have.

Yes, I think it's the best option.

Apt-cacher is easy to configure (very, very easy), and you must only
change apt sources from http://*.ubuntu.com to http://yourlocalserver
on every local machines.

-- 
Saludos:
Antonio Pérez