news at pointerstop.ca
Thu Oct 18 23:31:51 UTC 2007
Sylviane et Perry White wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 21:26, Derek Broughton wrote:
>> Sylviane et Perry White wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 17 October 2007 19:13, Galvanick Lucipher wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:25:00 Derek Broughton wrote:
>> >> > First, please use the "reply" function of your mail program -
>> >> > there's no threading on this message.
>> >> I though I had done it. Sorry.
>> > I think you have done it,Galvanick, from my threading tree it looks as
>> > if you answered the first mail from Darryl Tidd (dated Today 00:00:23)
>> > instead of
>> > the secons mail (darryl.tidd dated Today 05:34:29),but...
>> > View/Headers/All Header tells me you replied to the second mail.
> Ooops, sorry, I must have checked another mail.
> Your following comment applies perfectly.
> Strange thing is that Galvanick's mail had the following lines:
> .... On Wednesday 17 October 2007 05:34:29 darryl.tidd wrote:
> .... > The plot thickens. [. . .]
> It is hard to belive Galvanick would have forged them.
I'm sure he didn't - but it wasn't a "Reply", either. I didn't look to see
what mail client he used, but some of them need careful attention by the
More information about the kubuntu-users