Sylviane et Perry White
spwhite at freesurf.ch
Thu Oct 18 17:49:19 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 21:26, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Sylviane et Perry White wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 October 2007 19:13, Galvanick Lucipher wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:25:00 Derek Broughton wrote:
> >> > First, please use the "reply" function of your mail program - there's
> >> > no threading on this message.
> >> I though I had done it. Sorry.
> > I think you have done it,Galvanick, from my threading tree it looks as if
> > you answered the first mail from Darryl Tidd (dated Today 00:00:23)
> > instead of
> > the secons mail (darryl.tidd dated Today 05:34:29),but...
> > View/Headers/All Header tells me you replied to the second mail.
Ooops, sorry, I must have checked another mail.
Your following comment applies perfectly.
Strange thing is that Galvanick's mail had the following lines:
.... On Wednesday 17 October 2007 05:34:29 darryl.tidd wrote:
.... > The plot thickens. [. . .]
It is hard to belive Galvanick would have forged them.
> > I just can't figure that out, could be a minor bug or a quirk?
> > You probably are not responsible for that.
> Perhaps not, but I don't see any "References" or "In-Reply-To" header in
> Galvanick's post. You'll see it threaded if you use a mail program that
> permits pseudo-threading by matching the Subject.
BOFH excuse #196: Me no internet, only janitor, me just wax floors
More information about the kubuntu-users