AcrobatReader: A bug or intentionally?
art.alexion at verizon.net
Wed Apr 25 18:13:14 UTC 2007
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 01:58, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> > It is also not illegal for a Linux distro to include
> > software under terms agreed to with the provider of proprietary software.
> No, it's not. However, I'm not sure Acrobat still offers (or ever did)
> such terms.
Sure they do. Windows versions of the reader are often distributed by other
software vendors that use PDF for documentation. Two examples: Turbo Tax
exports the tax forms it generates to PDF and includes the reader with the
tax software. My cell phone Samsung and my carrier provide a CD with the
manual in PDF. The only software (application, not data) is the Acrobat
On its web site and in the forums, Adobe provides instructions for
distributing documentation via CD and configuring the reader to run from the
CD so that it need not be installed on the hard drive.
Adobe wants two things: To give away as many readers as possible to add value
to the PDF format and, hence make money selling PDF creation and editing
software. To keep its code proprietary.
Heresy alert: I don't care what Richard M. Stallman says, there is a
difference between free software and open source software. People can give
away proprietary software (like Adobe does) and sell open source software
(Like Red Hat and Suse do)
PGP fingerprint: 52A4 B10C AA73 096F A661 92D2 3B65 8EAC ACC5 BA7A
The attachment - signature.asc - is my electronic signature; no need for
alarm. Info @
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kubuntu-users