AcrobatReader: A bug or intentionally?
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Tue Apr 24 12:05:24 UTC 2007
Mark Wallace wrote:
> All that means is that it isn't GPL.
No, it means that it isn't free (http://gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html)
or open source (http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php) at all. In
fact, it apparently can't even be redistributed legally (any more).
> I have it installed. But the other PDF readers do seem to work flawlessly and
> are GPL. If you are used to it, why should you have to give it up on the
> grounds that you like Linux?
You don't have to, but Ubuntu can not legally distribute it. It may
have been illegal to do so before.
> I thought trying to limit your choices was the
> Microsoft way of thinking, not Linux's.
I recommend against installing it since it's unfree, but no one's trying
to stop you. /Adobe/ is the one that is keeping it proprietary.
Otherwise Ubuntu would distribute it without hesitation.
More information about the kubuntu-users