all my experiences and problems with kubuntu so far
Peter Shillan
peter.shillan at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 12:34:15 UTC 2005
Hi there,
On Apr 12, 2005 1:10 PM, Gunny Wallen <gunnyman at gmail.com> wrote:
> 've read this thread and I have to agree.
> Kubuntu feels like it was "tacked on" to Hoary.
> Gnome on the other hand is polished in just about every way.
> At this point the only KDE app I am using is amaroK.
I think that is rather harsh and, if I may say so, rather undervalues
the work of the Kubuntu team. I feel they are doing a sterling job.
It is perhaps natural, since they do not have the same resources
available, that the KDE strand might take a little longer to get
right. The new KDE version (3.4) is a far greater upgrade than Gnome
2.6->2.8 and has lots of new features that need to be tested. That's
what we are doing here.
I have been using Kubuntu now for a while and, while I appreciate
there must be Kubuntu specific bugs in it, I have never actually had
any problems whatsoever. I find this miraculous since I use a 3D
graphic accelerated laptop. So, for my part, Well Done!!
Peter.
P.S. Please trim the posts when you reply... the post I replied to
was absolutely enormous!
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list