Please all favors indicate if LTS and support length

[Clay Weber]

Agreed. 

On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:22:52 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> FWIW, I think that's prudent.
> 
> Scott K
> 
> On Monday, April 18, 2016 02:32:52 PM privat wrote:
> > Anyone against me answering "Short" for Kubuntu 16.04?
> > 
> > I don't think anyone would want to run the current LTS for more than 2
> > years (still lots of WIP stuff, even if usable), and I doubt anyone of
> > us will care about 16.04 much in ~2020.
> > 
> > for reference: 14.04 is "Normal"
> > 
> > Philip
> > 
> > Am 18.04.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Stéphane Graber:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > The request for MATE to be a 3 years LTS reminded us that we need to
> > > know what flavors will be LTS and how long they intend to support it.
> > > 
> > > The usual supports lengths are:
> > >   - Not LTS (9 months)
> > >   - Short LTS (3 years)
> > >   - Normal LTS (5 years)
> > > 
> > > Please all flavor leads reply to this e-mail, picking one of those 3
> > > options. Someone on the TB will then review and confirm the request.
> > > 
> > > This needs to happen very soon as we will need to update Launchpad to
> > > set the right support length on the various packages, which means that
> > > you can't produce final images until this is sorted.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!


-- 
Clay Weber