Please all favors indicate if LTS and support length

[Andree Evers]

I think 5 years good and should remain so.
If the successor LTS version makes problems you have so the possibility 
to use the old version until the new LTS version comes.
So that it is possible optionally to skipa version.
3 years is too short so that it would not go.
A LTS version should not go below 4 years Support.

Am 18.04.2016 um 20:37 schrieb Clay Weber:
> Agreed.
>
> On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:22:52 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> FWIW, I think that's prudent.
>>
>> Scott K
>>
>> On Monday, April 18, 2016 02:32:52 PM privat wrote:
>>> Anyone against me answering "Short" for Kubuntu 16.04?
>>>
>>> I don't think anyone would want to run the current LTS for more than 2
>>> years (still lots of WIP stuff, even if usable), and I doubt anyone of
>>> us will care about 16.04 much in ~2020.
>>>
>>> for reference: 14.04 is "Normal"
>>>
>>> Philip
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Stéphane Graber:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> The request for MATE to be a 3 years LTS reminded us that we need to
>>>> know what flavors will be LTS and how long they intend to support it.
>>>>
>>>> The usual supports lengths are:
>>>>    - Not LTS (9 months)
>>>>    - Short LTS (3 years)
>>>>    - Normal LTS (5 years)
>>>>
>>>> Please all flavor leads reply to this e-mail, picking one of those 3
>>>> options. Someone on the TB will then review and confirm the request.
>>>>
>>>> This needs to happen very soon as we will need to update Launchpad to
>>>> set the right support length on the various packages, which means that
>>>> you can't produce final images until this is sorted.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>