Fwd [ubuntu-release] Re: LTS status for Ubuntu flavours]

[Phil Wyett]

On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 11:48:13 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:08:35 Rohan Garg wrote:
> > > I think you are misreading that.  It specifically talks about users
> > 
> > potentially
> > 
> > > needing to upgrade only every 4 years.
> > 
> > Unless my eyes are deceiving me, the last line specifically talks about
> > upgrading twice every 4 years, which equates to a support lifetime of 2
> > years?
> 
> OK.  In any case, I still have 5 year LTS.  In addition to the reasons I
> mentioned previously, I don't want to accept Kubuntu being second class
> citizen in the Ubuntu project in any way I don't have to.
> 
> I think 5 years is working out for 12.04 (so far) and I don't think we
> should change.
> 
> Scott K

Hi all,

I would also like to see the LTS maintain the 5 years. Would the 14.04 LTS 
also follow the same ethos as 12.04 and stick with the original stack (kernel, 
xorg ...) and not update it as Ubuntu does at point release?

Regards

Phil Wyett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20140222/bdc520e5/attachment.pgp>