Trusty Merges

[Philip Muskovac]

IMO it's a bad idea to not merge at all. Esp. the 4.11 splits were rather quickly wrapped together and are usually done differently in debian.
For the rest it's probably better to check which changes debian has an apply those to our packages where it makes sense instead of doing full merges.

Also note: 4.12 beta1 tagging is November 6th, so we have ~ 5 days to get this done.

Philip

On Thursday 31 October 2013 20:35:42 Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> +1 for not doing a merge for 4.11 but -1 for not doing a full merge at all
> this cycle. Perhaps we can do a merge for 4.12/4.13?
> 
> Regards,
> Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
> Kubuntu Developer
> On 2013/10/31 下午7:20, "Jonathan Riddell" <jr at jriddell.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > We merged all the KDE SC and other Kubuntu packages last cycle so it's
> > up to date with Debian at KDE SC 4.10.2.  4.11.2 is in Debian
> > experimental so we have the option of merging again to get the latest
> > packaging but my thinking just now is it won't give us any great gain
> > but will cost lots of time and possibly some pain if we (usually I)
> > drop changes accidently.  So I'm thinking we only merge on a
> > case-by-case basis this cycle and do a full merge next time after the
> > LTS.  Any thoughts?
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > --
> > kubuntu-devel mailing list
> > kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20131101/48dd9972/attachment.pgp>