Amarok 2.4 backported to Lucid?

[Scott Kitterman]

Valorie Zimmerman <valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote:

You completely rock, Shadeslayer! Thanks so much for your swift and skillful work. Our tester is very happy. Next question - will phonon-backends besides xine be available to our Lucid users? I understand this requires an up-to-date phonon, and vlc 1.1.1. Backports team, what say you? Valorie On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Rohan Garg <rohangarg at ubuntu.com> wrote: > Hi > So i have some more news on this, i have have package currently > building here : https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/staging > Since i don't have a lucid machine, i could not test the package, thus > some feedback would be appreciated before i move it to the Kubuntu > Backports PPA > > Regards > Rohan Garg > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Rohan Garg <rohangarg at ubuntu.com> wrote: >> I'll have look at this in a few minutes in case no one has looked at this. >> >> On 2011 3 3 13:49, "Bart Cerneels" <bart.cerneels at kde.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 02:08, Valorie Zimmerman >>>
<valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, we've had quite a few requests for the backport of Amarok 2.4 to >>>> Lucid. Some people prefer to stay with LTS, and yet want fewer bugs in >>>> Amarok. One of our users tried to create a package in his PPA, but he >>>> was unsuccessful. What shall I tell our users? >>>> >>>> Valorie -- http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.com Last.fm, Facebook, Twitter, Identica, LinkedIn, Delicious: valoriez -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel 


We'd need someone to investigate what packages (including rdepends) would be affected.

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20110303/4e374164/attachment.html>