Colibri notifications by default?
tmt at ubuntu.com
Mon Jun 27 07:49:46 UTC 2011
2011/6/27 Jussi Schultink <jussi01 at ubuntu.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Michal Zajac <michal.zajac at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 27-06-2011 01:39 użytkownik "Scott Kitterman" <ubuntu at kitterman.com>
>>> Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> >Some time ago it was proposed that colibri notifications should be
>>> >used by default:
>>> >Also JT raises the valid concern that colibri does not do actions (by
>>> >Does anyone have good reasons why we should switch from the upstream
>>> >default to colibri?
>>> It would be a good way to convince me I was working on the wrong distro.
>> One thing to say at this point: +1 :)
>>> Scott K
>> Best regards,
> To me this is pretty simple, we have had a policy to stick with
> upstream KDE as much as possible, unless there is a compelling reason
> not to. For this reason among others, we stuck with rekonq, and to me,
> we should be sticking with KDE notifications, as in essence, there are
> no major issues with them IMHO. I don't feel "consistency across
> ubuntu variants" is a useful reason for moving to collibri.
>> kubuntu-devel mailing list
>> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Agreed, if there's no benefit to be gained (and no, I don't think
consistency alone is a benefit in this case), we have plenty of
reasons to keep doing the way we've been doing.
Jussi Kekkonen, Tm_T
More information about the kubuntu-devel