Colibri notifications by default?

[Jussi Kekkonen]

2011/6/27 Jussi Schultink <jussi01 at ubuntu.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Michal Zajac <michal.zajac at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 27-06-2011 01:39 użytkownik "Scott Kitterman" <ubuntu at kitterman.com>
>> napisał:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Some time ago it was proposed that colibri notifications should be
>>> >used by default:
>>> >https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/659819
>>> >
>>> >Also JT raises the valid concern that colibri does not do actions (by
>>> >design).
>>> >
>>> >Does anyone have good reasons why we should switch from the upstream
>>> >default to colibri?
>>>
>>> It would be a good way to convince me I was working on the wrong distro.
>>>
>> One thing to say at this point: +1 :)
>>> Scott K
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Michał
>
> To me this is pretty simple, we have had a policy to stick with
> upstream KDE as much as possible, unless there is a compelling reason
> not to. For this reason among others, we stuck with rekonq, and to me,
> we should be sticking with KDE notifications, as in essence, there are
> no major issues with them IMHO. I don't feel "consistency across
> ubuntu variants" is a useful reason for moving to collibri.
>
> BR
>
> Jussi
>>
>> --
>> kubuntu-devel mailing list
>> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>>
>>
>
> --
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>

Agreed, if there's no benefit to be gained (and no, I don't think
consistency alone is a benefit in this case), we have plenty of
reasons to keep doing the way we've been doing.

-- 
Jussi Kekkonen, Tm_T