Moving our branches (again)?
apachelogger at ubuntu.com
Sun Jun 26 13:14:06 UTC 2011
More spam, hi!
So, I was just wondering about the uglyness of our branch naming. We
have stuff like
Now that is an ubuntu branch of kdeedu owned by kubuntu-packagers.
Which really is not what the branch contains at all. If anything it is
the packaging of kdeedu owned by kubuntu-packagers.
General inquiry: what do you think about moving our branches once more
into a form of:
* easier scriptable in various ways as changing stuff is at the end of the url
* easier branching (currently if you branch and forget to specify a
name or use nested branching you get a folder 'ubuntu')
* overall clearer meaning
* yet another move
* should we ever move the same branches to full-source packaging that
would again break the sanity of the urls
Quite honestly I myself do not have strong feelings either direction,
but clearer urls certainly would be nice.
Also JR still needs to implement an alias so we can do bzr branch
More information about the kubuntu-devel