RFC: Switch to Firefox and a 1.5 GB image

Mark Fraser ubuntu at mfraz.orangehome.co.uk
Tue Dec 6 17:02:26 UTC 2011

On Tuesday 06 Dec 2011 16:52:24 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:44 AM, LucaTringali <TRINGALINVENT at libero.it> 
> > It would be illegal? But, if it's true, why I can install the same non
> > free packages from aptitude? Wouldn't it be illegal too? I'm not talking
> > about adding other non free tools, just deliver Kubuntu with
> > (preinstalled) the same non-free programs you can find in aptitude.
> Does Kubuntu's package manager not pop up a legal warning like
> Ubuntu's does if you install the non-free and patented codecs? Ubuntu
> tells you that you might be on legally shaky ground and asks whether
> you're sure you want to continue when you install I think it was
> ubuntu-restricted-extras.

Don't think I've ever seen one when installing kubuntu-restricted-extras, but 
then I use apt-get to install packages.

Registered Linux User #466407 http://counter.li.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20111206/526c250e/attachment.html>

More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list