krzysiek at lichota.net
Sat Dec 22 09:04:09 GMT 2007
Sarah Hobbs napisał(a):
> Krzysztof Lichota wrote:
>> Official statement from Canonical would help a lot here. Noone will
>> seriuosly rely on such statements if they are not officially backed.
> Riddell's statement should be regarded as official. He is the Canonical
> face of Kubuntu. Presumably the tech board will also issue a statement.
I was talking about the statement that "we will issue security updates
for 3 years anyway even if it is not LTS".
>> IMO 8.04 should be LTS release with mainly 3.5 support and with
>> option to try out KDE 4, if someone wishes to do so, but with
>> possibility of falling back to rock-stable 3.5 if some problems arise.
>> I think KDE 4 can be used as stable base since version 4.1 appears and
>> all young-age problems are tracked and solved. And when more apps using
>> KDE 4 will appear.
> This sort of discussion is useless. Kubuntu Hardy will not be LTS, as
> per the tech board's decision. This will not change by people
> complaining about it.
If voice of the community is not taken into account, I think there is
something seriously wrong about the process.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20071222/e0c56dd3/attachment.pgp
More information about the kubuntu-devel