[SRU][F:linux-bluefield][Pull Request][v2]: i2c-mlxbf.c: Sync up driver with upstreaming
Stefan Bader
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Wed Oct 5 07:42:46 UTC 2022
On 04.10.22 19:48, Asmaa Mnebhi wrote:
> This pull request (25 commits) includes reverting 8 i2c-mlxbf.c commits in
> Focal linux-bluefield. Then it cherry-picks 16 i2c-mlxbf.c related commits
> from linux-next master branch.
>
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991551
>
> This pull request page can be found at:
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~asmaam/ubuntu/+source/linux-bluefield/+git/version-seeds-2/+merge/430985
>
> Git repo can be found at:
>
> git+ssh://asmaam@git.launchpad.net/~asmaam/ubuntu/+source/linux-bluefield/+git/version-seeds-2 master-next
>
> for you to fetch changes starting from commit 5e92e369bc16d2ad686198a6ecffe7eff5c0f15c
>
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: support lock mechanism"
>
> Signed-off-by: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa at nvidia.com>
As a suggestion for future cases where things apply to both series: this could
be submitted as one thread like:
[SRU][F/J:linux-bluefield]: i2c-mlxbf.c: Sync up with upstream driver
-> the cover email
* [SRU][J:linux-bluefield][Pull Request]: i2c-mlxbf.c: Sync up driver with
upstreaming
-> the jammy pull request
* [SRU][F:linux-bluefield][Pull Request]: i2c-mlxbf.c: Sync up driver with
upstreaming
-> the focal one
Likewise if it were single patches it could have the jammy and focal variants
following (or single patches if those apply to both series).
I would use the rule of thumb that if something is under the same bug report it
should also be a single submission.
-Stefan
>
> Asmaa Mnebhi (17):
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: support lock mechanism"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: fix wrong variable name"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: remove IRQF_ONESHOT flag"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: prevent stack overflow in
> mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction()"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: revert upstreaming version"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: Syncup i2c-mlx driver with upstreamed version"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlx.c: Fix core frequency"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c: i2c-mlx: I2C SMBus driver for Mellanox
> BlueField SoC"
> i2c: mlxbf: incorrect base address passed during io write
> i2c: mlxbf: prevent stack overflow in
> mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction()
> i2c: mlxbf: Fix frequency calculation
> i2c: mlxbf: remove IRQF_ONESHOT
> i2c: mlxbf: support lock mechanism
> i2c: mlxbf: add multi slave functionality
> i2c: mlxbf: support BlueField-3 SoC
> i2c: mlxbf: remove device tree support
> UBUNTU: SAUCE: i2c-mlxbf.c: Add driver version
>
> Khalil Blaiech (6):
> i2c: mlxbf: I2C SMBus driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
> i2c: mlxbf: Add CONFIG_ACPI to guard ACPI function call
> i2c: mlxbf: Fix resrticted cast warning of sparse
> i2c: mlxbf: Remove unecessary wrapper functions
> i2c: mlxbf: Update reference clock frequency
> i2c: mlxbf: Update author and maintainer email info
>
> Sergey Shtylyov (1):
> i2c: mlxbf: add IRQ check
>
> Wang Xiaojun (1):
> i2c: mlxbf: Fix the return check of devm_ioremap and ioremap
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mlx.txt | 42 +
> .../bindings/i2c/mellanox,i2c-mlxbf.yaml | 78 -
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> debian.bluefield/config/config.common.ubuntu | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 5 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c | 2613 ++++++++---------
> 7 files changed, 1332 insertions(+), 1417 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mlx.txt
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/mellanox,i2c-mlxbf.yaml
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20221005/84e71bb6/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list