APPLIED[B/F]/cmnt: [SRU Bionic/Focal/Hirsute/Impish 0/2] LP: #1947161 - ACL updates on OCFS2 are not revalidated
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
cascardo at canonical.com
Thu Nov 4 17:43:43 UTC 2021
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 05:30:53PM +0100, Kleber Souza wrote:
> On 14.10.21 15:51, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947161
> >
> > [Impact]
> > When ACLs are updated on OCFS2, their caches are not revalidated, requiring remounts to be able to see the updates.
> >
> > [Fix]
> > Upstream commits:
> > 504ec37dfdfbf9c65166c51f7b12126d2a9b18dc ("ocfs2: fix remounting needed after setfacl command")
> > 9c0f0a03e386f4e1df33db676401547e1b7800c6 ("ocfs2: drop acl cache for directories too")
> >
> > [Test case]
> > On a single node:
> > setfacl -m u:user1:rwX dir1
> > getfacl dir1
> >
> > On multiple nodes:
> > Node1:
> > getfacl dir1
> >
> > Node2:
> > getfacl dir1
> >
> > Node1:
> > setfacl -m u:user1:rwX dir1
> > getfacl dir1
> >
> > Node2:
> > getfacl dir1
> >
> > [Potential regression]
> > ACL changes on OCFS2 may stop working properly.
> >
> > Gang He (1):
> > ocfs2: fix remounting needed after setfacl command
> >
> > Wengang Wang (1):
> > ocfs2: drop acl cache for directories too
> >
> > fs/ocfs2/acl.c | 2 ++
> > fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
>
> Applied patch 1/2 to [bionic/focal]:linux.
>
> Patch 2/2 had already been applied to all four series as part of upstream
> stable updates.
Can you please add the BugLink to those commits? Whenever we drop patches
specifically submitted for a bug in favor of an upstream stable update, we fail
to notify users who asked for that bug about them being applied and waiting for
verification.
Cascardo.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kleber
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list