[UPSTREAM][RFC PATCH] integrity: add informational messages when revoking certs.
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at canonical.com
Mon May 10 14:48:01 UTC 2021
On 10/05/2021 10:40, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> integrity_load_cert() prints messages of the source and cert details
> when adding certs as trusted. Mirror those messages in
> uefi_revocation_list_x509() when adding certs as revoked.
>
> Sample dmesg with this change:
>
> [ 1.538741] integrity: Platform Keyring initialized
> [ 1.960071] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db
> [ 1.961986] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011: 13adbf4309bd82709c8cd54f316ed522988a1bd4'
> [ 1.974041] integrity: Revoking X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListXRT (MOKvar table)
> [ 1.978852] blacklist: Revoked X.509 cert 'Canonical Ltd. Secure Boot Signing: 61482aa2830d0ab2ad5af10b7250da9033ddcef0'
> [ 1.985850] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT (MOKvar table)
> [ 1.989651] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Canonical Ltd. Master Certificate Authority: ad91990bc22ab1f517048c23b6655a268e345a63'
Strip the [] from the dmesg. They make it harder to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov at canonical.com>
> ---
>
> Another RFC patch that I'd like to submit upstream, based on
> v5.13-rc1.
I think you can just send it upstream and get the comments there. It's
not confidential (already made public through kernel-team list) and
upstream (specialized) folks might know this pieces better than us.
>
> certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
> security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index c9a435b15af40..738c496756516 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size)
> if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> pr_err("Problem with revocation key (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key));
> return PTR_ERR(key);
> + } else {
> + pr_notice("Revoked X.509 cert '%s'\n",
> + key_ref_to_ptr(key)->description);
> + key_ref_put(key);
This seems unrelated, based on the commit description. Why do you need it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list