ACK/cmnt: [SRU B/D/E/F/U 0/1] Fix seccomp_bpf on powerpc
juerg.haefliger at canonical.com
Wed Jul 1 07:54:42 UTC 2020
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:06:06 -0300
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo at canonical.com> wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885757
> The patch has just been submitted upstream, still pending review.
> seccomp_bpf test fails on powerpc and ends up being disabled on some series, or
> causing engineers to waste their time verifying the same failures are the only
> ones we see every kernel release.
> [Test case]
> Run the test and notice there are no more failures.
> [Regression potential]
> We may break the test on different architectures. That doesn't break users,
> though, as the changes are only on tests. It has been tested at least on
> ppc64el and amd64.
> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (1):
> UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests/seccomp: fix ptrace tests on powerpc
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 24 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This code makes my head spin but given the description it seems to make sense.
Any particular reason why this wasn't tested on more architectures?
It's 'only' selftests, so:
Acked-by: Juerg Haefliger <juergh at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the kernel-team