[Acked/CMT] [PATCH 0/4][linux-signed*] Correct source package in Built-Using control field

Andy Whitcroft apw at canonical.com
Wed Apr 10 08:10:59 UTC 2019

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:24:50PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824016
> The Built-Using field hardcodes "linux" as the source package, even for the
> hwe & hwe-edge packages. Correct that. Technically only the
> linux-signed-hwe{-edge} packages need this fix, but I'm including patches
> for linux-signed as well to prevent future occurences due to cargo-culting.

These look sane enough.  I think PACKAGE is a terrible name as which
package is that, yes it happens to be the parent, but that is really not
clear.  Could we call it something else?  We use SRCPKGNAME for 'our'
package name in linux itself.  BUPKGNAME would fit in _that_ horrible
naming scheme.  Perhaps BUILT_USING_PACKAGE ?

Also we must have this problem in more -signed packages than are
included in this set, we should have a review across all our -signeds.

With a sane name chosen:

Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw at canonical.com>


More information about the kernel-team mailing list