[PATCH][SRU][Bionic] scsi: libiscsi: Allow sd_shutdown on bad transport
Rafael David Tinoco
rafael.tinoco at canonical.com
Tue Jan 23 16:05:05 UTC 2018
> On 23/01/2018, at 02:00 PM, Kleber Souza <kleber.souza at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>> In this case it could be:
>>>
>>> [PATCH][SRU][Bionic][Artful][Xenial][Trusty] scsi: libiscsi: ...
>>
>> Good to know. Will use in the future. For this case, please note that
>> the Trusty patch wasn't clean cherry-pick, like others, but didn't
>> differ in anything meaningful.
>
> When it doesn't apply cleanly please mark it as (backported from ...),
> even if it's only for small things such as context adjustment. The rule
> is that 'cherry picked from ...' should be used only if the patch can be
> applied with git am.
>
> Also, to help making the review a bit easier for us, the patches can be
> sent in a thread with a cover letter containing the SRU justification.
Makes perfect sense. Should I re-do it ? What do you prefer ?
Tku
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list