Why was linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24_2.6.24-28.46 not built for LPIA?

[Colin Ian King]

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 09:52 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 09:34 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > On 01/19/2011 07:54 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:25:35PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> >>
> >>> In theory the meta packages should not be uploaded until the kernel and
> >>> all of its dependant packages have been built. It sounds like one may
> >>> have been missed here. The kernel stable team owns those packages so I
> >>> will poke them to look into it.
> >>
> >> In this case the build seems to have been requested but failed
> >> unexpectedly; likely a buildd dissappeared in the middle. We have
> >> requested a rebuild on this package.
> >>
> >> -apw
> >>
> >
> > Since the package builds fine in a Hardy LPIA chroot, I'm thinking
> > soething is busted with the buildd. I've tried restarting the build to
> > no avail. It doesn't even produce a build log.
> >
> > Steve or Brad - could one of you bug a Soyuz dude to investigate?
> >
> 
> Well, I've successfully rebuilt Hardy LUM by incrementing the upload 
> number, so I guess it was just a transient problem. I'll see about 
> getting it pocket copied to the right place.

Is there anyway of automatically detecting such failures for next time
around?
> 
> rtg
> -- 
> Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
>