Why was linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24_2.6.24-28.46 not built for LPIA?

Tim Gardner tcanonical at tpi.com
Thu Jan 20 16:52:14 UTC 2011

On 01/19/2011 09:34 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 07:54 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:25:35PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> In theory the meta packages should not be uploaded until the kernel and
>>> all of its dependant packages have been built. It sounds like one may
>>> have been missed here. The kernel stable team owns those packages so I
>>> will poke them to look into it.
>> In this case the build seems to have been requested but failed
>> unexpectedly; likely a buildd dissappeared in the middle. We have
>> requested a rebuild on this package.
>> -apw
> Since the package builds fine in a Hardy LPIA chroot, I'm thinking
> soething is busted with the buildd. I've tried restarting the build to
> no avail. It doesn't even produce a build log.
> Steve or Brad - could one of you bug a Soyuz dude to investigate?

Well, I've successfully rebuilt Hardy LUM by incrementing the upload 
number, so I guess it was just a transient problem. I'll see about 
getting it pocket copied to the right place.

Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com

More information about the kernel-team mailing list