Ubuntu kernel labeling scheme confuses the hell out of me.
Mackenzie Morgan
macoafi at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 03:48:52 UTC 2009
On Monday 02 March 2009 10:10:01 pm Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > It makes no sense to me to encode the stable update version in the
> > package version because there are often other unrelated bug fixes
> > bundled into the upload.
>
> I don't think I follow, like what?
>
> > What about those times when a kernel package is
> > uploaded without any stable upstream updates?
>
> Not sure I follow either.
Ubuntu's kernel team does some in-house patching, ex cherry-picking from other
upstream kernel releases or writing patches and applying them here before
upstream accepts them. Those can certainly be uploaded to the archive in the
absence of a new upstream stable release.
--
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20090302/dc5198f2/attachment.sig>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list