applesmc: hardy-lbm or hardy SRU?

Tim Gardner tcanonical at tpi.com
Tue Nov 4 21:49:10 UTC 2008


Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> I imagine its a substantial patch, so vetting it in LBM probably makes
>> the most sense. It it proves to be functional and stable, then we could
>> eventually migrate it into the kernel as an SRU.
> 
> Good good, here is the patch for the module itself. It is also attached to
> 
> LP #284417
> 
> Cheers,
> Henrik
> 
> 

applied

-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com




More information about the kernel-team mailing list