applesmc: hardy-lbm or hardy SRU?
Tim Gardner
tcanonical at tpi.com
Tue Nov 4 21:49:10 UTC 2008
Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> I imagine its a substantial patch, so vetting it in LBM probably makes
>> the most sense. It it proves to be functional and stable, then we could
>> eventually migrate it into the kernel as an SRU.
>
> Good good, here is the patch for the module itself. It is also attached to
>
> LP #284417
>
> Cheers,
> Henrik
>
>
applied
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list