New feature for charmers - min-juju-version

[Ryan Beisner]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Martin Packman <
martin.packman at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 23/03/2016, Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > To summarize:
> > If we do nothing with regard to juju 1.25.x or the various tools, and if
> a
> > relevant charm grows a series list in metadata, a load of existing
> > validation and demo bundles will no longer be deployable with 1.25.x
> > because `juju deploy` on 1.25.x traces when receiving a list type as a
> > metadata series value.  These type of bundles often point at gh: and lp:
> > charm dev/feature branches, so the charm series metadata is as it is in
> the
> > dev charm's trunk (unmodified by the charm store).
>
> I've landed a change on the 1.25 branch that accepts a list of series
> in charm metadata and takes the first value as the default series.
>
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1563607>
>
> Charm authors will still need to that that kind of multi series charm
> and place it in named-series-directories under $JUJU_REPOSITORY to
> deploy with 1.X but I think this is fine for your use case?
>

Indeed, that directly addresses the issue and opens us up for cross-1.x-2.x
charm dev and testing.  Many thanks!



>
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160330/870d23f9/attachment.html>