nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

[James Page]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/05/14 13:13, Quentin Hartman wrote:
>> nova-compute should be if one of the nova network options is used
>> in the nova-cloud-controller charm.  I'll run this option through
>> our lab again today to make sure that it is.
> 
> Thanks again for the additional info. I'd love to hear what your
> results are and appreciate you looking into it. Is there anything
> that need be done to specify that other than using the flatmanager
> or flatdhcpmanager options?

I ran a nova-network topology test - nova-network and nova-api
services get enabled on the nova-compute nodes as spec for multi-host
mode.

Looking at our config we just set - FlatDHCPManager for
network-manager option in the nova-cloud-controller charm.

>> Note that pushing multiple charms onto the same service units
>> without LXC container use is not support other than for the
>> following charms - which need to not be in LXC containers:
>> 
>> nova-compute ceph/ceph-osd swift-storage
>> 
>> This allows you to maximise storage/compute usage in deployments
>> - but it won't fit everyones requirements.
> 
> That is the solution I hit on as well, and so will be exploring lxc
> when I return to this project next week. For my purposes having
> Maas, juju, and the control services for open stack on separate
> boxes is wasteful. My deployment isn't large enough to need that
> much hardware in the control layer.

We run an internal test cloud on 6 nodes; 5 compute/ceph/swift nodes
and 1 control node with everything else in LXC containers.  Juju
controls the creation of the lxc containers:

   juju deploy cinder --to lxc:0

Deploys the cinder charm to a lxc container on physical machine 0 (yes
- - that is the bootstrap node :-)).

We also push the quantum-gateway charm onto the bootstrap node without
LXC for north/south network connectivity for instances.

>> Nick, who also wrote the MAAS and Juju documentation, has been
>> working on a OpenStack + Juju + MAAS guide this cycle - its in
>> final review and hopefully should be out in the next couple of
>> weeks.
> 
> Is there a way I can help with and or review the wip? I'm hoping to
> have this deployment in service in a couple weeks and I'm sure the 
> information in the guide would be quite valuable to me, even if
> it's not yet perfect.

Not sure - I'll let Nick answer this question.


- -- 
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.page at ubuntu.com
jamespage at debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=G8xH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----