Charns with Multiple Maintainers

[Charles Butler]

Incoming thread necromancy

Have we come to a general consensus on adding a new flag for "maintainers"
to list multiple maintainers, and leave "maintainer" in place?

What kind of implications does this have when someone adds themselves to
"maintainers" with a "maintainer" left in the metadata? are they a sub
maintainer?

I'd like to have a clearly defined agreed upon request so I can file the
bug and champion its resolution. While its not mission critical, I fear
this will go stale if we don't move on it soon.


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Joshua Strobl <truthfromlies at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think the use of "maintainers" rather than "maintainer" would be
> appropriate. Would we use it in both instances of a single and multiple
> maintainers, check for both when doing a charm proof, have charm proof
> set the use of "maintainer" as opposed to "maintainer" as a warning that
> gets outputted, etc.
>
> On 03/03/2014 04:45 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> > Should maintainer be renamed to
> > maintainers to match the rest of the potentially plural options?
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20140311/6d468266/attachment.html>