Charns with Multiple Maintainers

[Joshua Strobl]

I think the use of "maintainers" rather than "maintainer" would be
appropriate. Would we use it in both instances of a single and multiple
maintainers, check for both when doing a charm proof, have charm proof
set the use of "maintainer" as opposed to "maintainer" as a warning that
gets outputted, etc.

On 03/03/2014 04:45 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> Should maintainer be renamed to
> maintainers to match the rest of the potentially plural options?