What would you like to see in the virtual Charm School hangouts?
gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com
Sat May 25 21:49:07 UTC 2013
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Mark Canonical Ramm-Christensen
<mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com> wrote:
> I *think* Kapil and I are on the same page. Perhaps build is the wrong
> term, and perhaps this is not a good idea or a good solution to the problem
> -- but it was discussed last week (and a couple of times before) and I think
> it would be good to get at least the three of us together next week sometime
> on a google hangout to get clear on the details of what is being discussed,
> and then on both the viability of the idea, and it's relative priority.
I'm happy to participate in such a meeting, but in addition to
discussing it in a hangout and losing history again, we need a
document which provides good reasoning and a careful explanation about
what is being proposed and why, and specifically a compelling reason
why the *current* model does not support what is being suggested,
noting that charms _can_ have more than code, charms _can_ have binary
files, binary files _can_ be in VCSs trivially, etc.
The role of juju is to enable such use cases, not to hardcode every
decision in its core and becoming a hodgepodge of complexity .
gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
More information about the Juju