Proposal for new charm policies.

[Javier P.L.]

On 14/05/13 at 06:28pm, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ceppi at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Jorge O. Castro <jorge at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >> Specifically I'd like to propose these 5 things to move into policy:
> >>
> >> - 3 acks for charm reviews before a charm is considered "reviewed" in the
> >> store.
> >>
> >> Now that we're getting more mature we need to keep the charm quality
> >> high. So along with landing charm testing we'd like to start doing
> >> more peer review on incoming charms.
> >
> > This concerns me given the number of reviewing charmers currently and the
> > size of our queue on any one basis. Currently charms are just ACK'd by one
> 
> I know Jorge has this in mind, but it also concerns me. We need to
> keep the flow flowing. It's better to have less quality but real users
> excited and pushing real and usable charms forward, than a handful of
> charms and a deceived community.

Talking about real users.., please make README's a must, I've done a couple of
charms and working in a third one and I don't understand how to deploy some
of the other charms in the CS which doesn't have a README

Cheers