Proposal for new charm policies.

Mark Shuttleworth mark at
Tue May 14 20:57:02 UTC 2013

On 05/09/2013 01:51 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> - 3 acks for charm reviews before a charm is considered "reviewed" in the store.
> Now that we're getting more mature we need to keep the charm quality
> high. So along with landing charm testing we'd like to start doing
> more peer review on incoming charms.

We could also simply publish the star rating for a charm, and let
'market forces' take their course. As long as users can see that a charm
is new, and not yet highly rated, they can make their own choices.

> - Create nagios checks and not which things are critical to monitor.
> This bullet is now confusing to me, I think we mean monitoring instead
> of explicitly saying Nagios, I'll let Matt or Tom weigh in here to
> clear up this one.

If a charm connects to Nagios, that's great, but I don't see that it
needs to do so by policy.


More information about the Juju mailing list