Proposal for new charm policies.

Jorge O. Castro jorge at
Mon May 13 15:31:34 UTC 2013

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Wedgwood
<matthew.wedgwood at> wrote:
> The discussion that led to this new policy acknowledged that the requirement
> would be lowered after we'd built an automated testing infrastructure.

So at lunch the next day Mims brought up that a good way to kill
momentum with contributors is to grind reviews to a halt.

> I agree that three reviewers is too many, but our charm quality is suffering
> and eyeballs are all we've got at the moment.

It looks like testing is really pretty close to landing, it might be
worth it just to wait the ~3 weeks.

There's a session for this at vUDS for those that feel strongly about
it, though I'm starting to lean towards "Don't mess with it".

Jorge Castro
Canonical Ltd.

More information about the Juju mailing list