Proposal for new charm policies.

[Jorge O. Castro]

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Wedgwood
<matthew.wedgwood at canonical.com> wrote:
> The discussion that led to this new policy acknowledged that the requirement
> would be lowered after we'd built an automated testing infrastructure.

So at lunch the next day Mims brought up that a good way to kill
momentum with contributors is to grind reviews to a halt.

> I agree that three reviewers is too many, but our charm quality is suffering
> and eyeballs are all we've got at the moment.

It looks like testing is really pretty close to landing, it might be
worth it just to wait the ~3 weeks.

There's a session for this at vUDS for those that feel strongly about
it, though I'm starting to lean towards "Don't mess with it".

--
Jorge Castro
Canonical Ltd.
http://juju.ubuntu.com