Proposal for new charm policies.
Jorge O. Castro
jorge at ubuntu.com
Mon May 13 15:31:34 UTC 2013
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Wedgwood
<matthew.wedgwood at canonical.com> wrote:
> The discussion that led to this new policy acknowledged that the requirement
> would be lowered after we'd built an automated testing infrastructure.
So at lunch the next day Mims brought up that a good way to kill
momentum with contributors is to grind reviews to a halt.
> I agree that three reviewers is too many, but our charm quality is suffering
> and eyeballs are all we've got at the moment.
It looks like testing is really pretty close to landing, it might be
worth it just to wait the ~3 weeks.
There's a session for this at vUDS for those that feel strongly about
it, though I'm starting to lean towards "Don't mess with it".
More information about the Juju