Dropping instance-state in juju status for a machine

Dimiter Naydenov dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com
Fri Apr 12 08:13:29 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12.04.2013 09:50, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
> Den 11. april 2013 21:41, skrev William Reade:
>> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 12:55 +0200, Dimiter Naydenov wrote:
>>> I'm proposing to drop that field in the Go-Juju's status command,
>>> unless somebody raises up and claims this is really needed. We can add
>>> it post-2.0 (hence the bug), but not for now.
>>>
>>> Objections? Thoughts?
>>
>> Assuming we don't hear from anyone who depends on it, I have no
>> objections: I'd rather skip it than fake it.
>>
>> The more noise is made by people who depend on this functionality,
>> though, the faster we'll get around to reinstating it. So, anyone
>> affected, please speak up :).
>
> Is this actually removing the command that I use all the time using
the Python version, "juju status"?
Not the command itself, just a piece of information, namely that
"instance-state" line from the machine info output.
>
> --
> Marius
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRZ8IpAAoJENzxV2TbLzHwPvoH+wUbO4O9/AUmtoS/OpvSxo3G
NRrcWY1szbm8yPt+L1lVIQR5TA7WQcMIGQJbxm6YmsqY7Z4Cz4PWFEVDo4NPNaWn
fa9+UR+EsLWOuDIWshT8QOo663NvJFh1FEipnKDJ6gm6Jsk0ykWOrI5/aLMSCxda
IooQEG9wJH36fwipjse8Zp8pINhYEbQJsiXtbaRJEm3zaV5f8GIPGA6FUlqw2dvI
1Ckn7ztvaadJTt/mjEdlLDUnpDrpFBobXZdMExUMqBLuP4TIHOWS/Xoyi95YNqsO
5n2+Pgy/0alzZhwFzd9ciclKykCVZ+9JZdJb3K5N7ZQ6Y86UVcPfQsTlKK8gvdk=
=cAjI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Juju mailing list