lp:charm vs. lp:charms

[Robbie Williamson]

On 01/18/2012 04:41 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I continue to see a lot of people refer to lp:charm as lp:charms. The
> background of the choice was that a charm would always be referred to
> in the singular (lp:charm/oneiric/hadoop), but if everybody feels like
> lp:charms is the correct way to spell it, we should probably change it
> now while we still have time. I'm working on the store, and soon it'll
> become a lot harder to do those changes. I'm not sure if the lp folks
> can set up redirection in a way that bzr would be happy with, but
> that'd be pretty much the only significant reference right now, I
> suppose? Oh, and maybe Kapil's charm browser.
> 
> So, do we switch, or do we forget about it and move on?
> 
I admit finding myself typing lp:charms first, then removing the "s",
but I don't think it's worth the effort...unless a simple redirect is
possible. (my two cents)

-Robbie

-- 
Robbie Williamson <robbie at ubuntu.com>
robbiew[irc.freenode.net]

"Don't make me angry...you wouldn't like me when I'm angry."
 -Bruce Banner