Merge gating for more juju subprojects
Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilkins at canonical.com
Tue Mar 24 23:33:17 UTC 2015
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Martin Packman <
martin.packman at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 13/03/2015, Martin Packman <martin.packman at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > That said, if there are any packages you think we should *not* gate
> > landings on their test suite passing yet, please say now.
>
> With the lack of objections, I've gone ahead and made the more active
> projects in the juju namespace on github merge gated.
>
Thanks Martin.
> From now on, to land branches for:
>
> juju/errors
> juju/loggo
> juju/names
> juju/testing
> juju/utils
>
> Add "$$merge$$" in a comment on the pr and wait for the bot to run tests.
>
> Please poke me if you notice anything amiss.
Katherine just tried to $$merge$$ a go-goose branch, and it looks like the
script is broken: https://github.com/go-goose/goose/pull/3
Tests passed, but merge failed. Ian merged manually.
Cheers,
Andrew
> Martin
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20150325/744ff224/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list