Please, no more types called "State"

Gustavo Niemeyer gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com
Thu Mar 12 14:17:26 UTC 2015


When I was new to juju myself, we only had one State, I believe. That
one golden state was supposed to represent the state of the whole
deployment, so it was indeed The State of the system. Having tons of
these indeed sounds awkward.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Michael Foord
<michael.foord at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/15 05:01, David Cheney wrote:
>>
>> lucky(~/src/github.com/juju/juju) % pt -i type\ State\ | wc -l
>>
>> 23
>>
>> Thank you.
>
>
> When I was new to Juju the fact that we had a central "State", core to the
> Juju model, but we had umpteen types called State - so where you saw a State
> you had no idea what it actually was and when someone mentioned State you
> couldn't be sure what they meant - was a significant part of the learning
> curve.
>
> Perhaps a better solution would have been a better name for the core State.
>
> Michael
>
>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

-- 
gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net



More information about the Juju-dev mailing list