Is ReviewBoard a good thing?
Dimiter Naydenov
dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com
Fri Sep 19 08:12:59 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19.09.2014 03:32, David Cheney wrote:
> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address,
> review comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no
> way to to chained proposals.
>
> I think that over the last few months we've all learnt to live
> with the first issue
>
> On the second, github now does nice side by side diffs.
>
> On the third, it appears reviewboard leaves you solidly to your
> own devices to implement chained proposals.
>
> I'm with Jesse, I vote to stop using reviewboard, I don't think
> it's paying it's way.
+1, Due to all the steps you need (to automate) in order to post the
review correctly, you're on your own w.r.t. chained diffs, finally the
annoying web UI win non-obvious and ways of doing things; I'm a bit
disappointed at what RB brings more than just using GitHub PRs.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Jesse Meek
> <jesse.meek at canonical.com> wrote:
>> We moved to GitHub in the hope of lowering the bar to
>> contributors outside the team. GitHub is *the* platform and
>> process for open source software. This was the logic behind the
>> move. It was deemed to have the most mindshare and we sacrificed
>> our prefered platform and process to be part of that mindshare.
>>
>> We are now leaving that 'main stream' process to something that
>> suits the tastes of our team - ReviewBoard. This adds friction
>> for new contributors (friction everyone has experienced this
>> week). If we value our preferred methods of reviewing over
>> keeping to a well known process for outside contributors, the
>> best process was launchpad + rietveld. Shouldn't we simply return
>> to that.
>>
>> Considering we have been successfully using GitHub for several
>> months now, using reviewboard is not a necessity. Obviously, I
>> will go with whatever the team decides, but I'm concerned that we
>> have moved to reviewboard without considering that it undermines
>> (as far as I can see) our primary reason for using GitHub.
>>
>> Jess
>>
>> -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com Modify
>> settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
- --
Dimiter Naydenov <dimiter.naydenov at canonical.com>
juju-core team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUG+WLAAoJENzxV2TbLzHwbw8H/3a7LlCW4FUYsGklM2/P78+q
8KpjZkNrbSD4PY9CGuRIcOKrT40VCJXMuMlfsaXyIXPktD+zTQGjAjlFMAXaA5El
LUmRIwL4vHJuioNerkTBlgyzWqsyl8KA0M1IKilga+GQk7hhEvPcmWLBQI+Qniz2
+GvjG4xUb+QSsFpL3TIbZC8vMu0vsFU3N73v5LTxhxh3udr0AM8dHBHIuVcMHXMF
1nAs4DbIBDSKoJ5e7vvnKn/h6XiBP2iJNwWZBwnjpKEwXW8fSX7vR16CQDOQd4Pd
3KiDTMc1qC32SqAfpvoOc9oEJad0r/+xFvV1phBAS9X5ry3AuBpOHmDiPB/EwCA=
=n7u4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list