Where should loggo live (and errgo, ...)?

[Nate Finch]

Yeah, I agree, I don't think the name juju necessarily will put people off.
 I'd use github.com/docker/loggo.  Most people realize the first pathname
after github.com is the user/group name, not a project name.

This is actually one place where github is a lot better than launchpad -
the repo landing pages.  If we write nice READMEs, it'll be clear that the
top level stuff under github.com/juju is as reusable as anyone else's repos
(except juju-core).



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:56 AM, William Reade
<william.reade at canonical.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> When I wrote the original email, I was thinking of something like
>> "juju-team" as
>> well, for the generic library projects (pending bikeshedding of
>> "juju-team").
>> github.com/juju/... would still be used for all the Juju specific
>> projects.
>>
>
> I'm not sure we get much benefit from making this distinction. It's true
> that someone just reading the juju source will not necessarily be aware
> that loggo/errgo are independently viable; but whenever anyone sees them
> actually used in an external project, it will be clear that they *are*
> independent. Popularising those libraries in the first place is a separate
> problem, and I'm not sure the precise github url is going to be a major
> blocker there; and if it *is* -- if we hear people saying "I'd use loggo if
> it weren't in the juju namespace" -- it'd be pretty easy to fix that, I
> think.
>
> Cheers
> William
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140306/10588f37/attachment.html>