Upcoming import change for loggo

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nate Finch <nate.finch at canonical.com> wrote:
> For the record, I'm not a fan of duplicating the package name of anything in
> the standard library.   Obviously, sometimes collisions will happen if a new
> package is added to the standard library, but it seems like a bad idea to do
> it on purpose.  When you're deep in the middle of a file, and you see
>
> log.Printf()

That looks like a pretty interesting example of when a matching
package name *is* a good idea. If I was able to just switch a logging
package and be able to have things working seamlessly, I'd love it.


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net