What happened to pinned bootstrap

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14-04-17 11:48 AM, John Meinel wrote:
> FWIW that isn't what you get if you do "apt-get install foo"

That is fine *if* you do apt-get install foo.

But the user isn't doing apt-get install juju-core.  They're just
doing juju bootstrap.  They should expect to get exactly the same
thing they got yesterday when they ran juju bootstrap.

If the user wants to upgrade, that's great.  They know how to do that,
and from then on, bootstrap will select the latest-and-greatest agent.
 But don't take the choice to upgrade out of the user's hands.

> I don't have a problem with "juju bootstrap" growing a "--version" 
> target (same as apt-get install foo=1.2.3). But I think our policy
> of giving you the best version we've released that matches is
> reasonable.

Any version that hasn't been tested with the client is NOT the best
version.  We cannot support what we do not test.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTT/mQAAoJEK84cMOcf+9haPIH/2os5BBsmHzSk6bhilKC7h8E
XJqWUKPX1mpD49voAl5S2evA0nEi4yO8NtgrUCheHYO3QtlAF2Pn3oSJiypIK/M4
83dSlvVIeMyZWOx3qnQyPXJ3uBy94jiP+oLYMIRTKWulm82h8mBCLPKr1ffJCkvV
ZmKsemBCdVJICFJ8GksWSznigzLqCF0se6q9m9SBOLkFwAqjMFFMnfdKQIKr8bAh
G1UtYJSzUfHODMoQNNy0TcVVTCKq1LsjeS1rYmTvQD0CmsPxGd1T9KaMhuLq+275
WyedeZwItTSwnqmCDrUudFlzc8UxHiFbLiNckbZbdQ+nChGJwY982Z6ILQ/Mjrc=
=+1cM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----