Proliferation of small packages

[Ian Booth]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

My IDE "types" all the imports for me so I personally don't mind if there are many.

I'm +1 on the focused functionality argument as opposed to a big bucket of
everything all in one approach.

On 30/05/13 17:03, Tim Penhey wrote:
> On 30/05/13 18:14, David Cheney wrote:
>> Apart from everything inside the utils/* can be moved into one
>> package, I have no other examples at this time.
> 
>> My meta comment would be when considering writing new code, don't
>> automatically try to namespace it with a package.
> 
> While I agree in principle, I don't see any problem with having small
> defined namespaces of functions.
> 
> Tim
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iJwEAQECAAYFAlGm+roACgkQCJ79BCOJFcaxdAP/ddjBz2eHdp5RSJr3Nez8I1aP
u1/MUcJUollKr5we0CavyPm2nkrUYialoizDH96cTYasGT20+jSOka/ksfcmPZF4
vMnD23W7ANVALrdA6DhgF6njnfX3S5BLwZfb9ZPcwQSzLjVImNhs4CL5R+rv0Ve7
fMKLueYao6vFrD0R404=
=VYkV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----