Proliferation of small packages

[Tim Penhey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30/05/13 18:14, David Cheney wrote:
> Apart from everything inside the utils/* can be moved into one
> package, I have no other examples at this time.
> 
> My meta comment would be when considering writing new code, don't 
> automatically try to namespace it with a package.

While I agree in principle, I don't see any problem with having small
defined namespaces of functions.

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGm+bcACgkQd1fvI4G7WRBEvACdGMsDS6+/ODJgwG2s6EyQB8ly
O2wAoIrqsjEXMuq3ni0YiTY2Cu+eyMae
=4l6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----