Interim plan to move away from the mongo tarball

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mark Ramm
<mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com> wrote:
> I did read it.  I take it that you are now referring to the " bootstrapping
> only happens on the specific series that the respective juju in use was
> deployed on" I'm sorry if I was confused about that -- I did read the

I'm not "now" referring to it. I've proposed that 10h ago, 7h before
you sent a message dismissing the whole conversation as "we don't have
time" and ignoring that proposal.

> thread, and was interested in discussion on locking down the bootstrap node
> to the "current" series, but thought that perhaps you were still also
> arguing for the tarball solution -- particularly since you said in the
> e-mail I replied to "if you can't spare the time to build a tarball with
> binaries, nothing else will do."

The entire paragraph is "If you're in such a hurry, you can DO NOTHING
rather than half-baking a solution that has seen little discussion and
has known real problems being ignored. WHAT EXISTS TODAY isn't
perfect but works, and if you can't spare the time to build a tarball
with binaries, nothing else will do."


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net